|
|
Acquisition Integration Approaches |
12manage reaches 100.000 members |
Mergers and Acquisitions. Explanation of Acquisition Integration Approaches of Philippe Haspeslagh and David Jemison. ('90) |
|
|
The Acquisition Integration Approaches model of Philippe Haspeslagh and David Jemison provides insight and guidance in Mergers and Acquisitions on choosing the optimal integration approach.
In Mergers and Acquisitions, the motto often traditionally was: "Make them like us". Or relatively simple criteria were used to choose an approach. Such as the size and quality of the acquired firm.
Haspeslagh and Jemison (1990) have stated that the approach, which a company should take towards integration, should be understood by considering two (additional) criteria:
Four Types of value creation in Mergers and AcquisitionsObviously, the goal and central task in any acquisition is to create the value that is enabled when the two organizations are combined. There are four types of value creation:
Organizational AutonomyHaspeslagh and Jemison warn that managers must not lose sight of the fact that the strategic task of an acquisition is to create value. Furthermore they must not grant autonomy too quickly, although obviously people are important and should be treated fairly and with dignity. The need for organizational autonomy can be answered using three questions:
The Preferred Mergers and Acquisitions modelDepending on the score on the above two factors (see graph), the preferred Acquisition Integration Approaches are:
Acquisition Integration Approaches Special Interest Group
Acquisition Integration Approaches Forum
Acquisition Integration Approaches Education & Events
Compare with this Acquisition Integration Approaches: Core Competence | Leveraged Buy-out | Parenting Styles | Value Based Management | Porter | Parenting Advantage | Horizontal Integration | Turnaround Management | Management Buy-out | BCG Matrix | Growth Phases | Distinctive Capabilities | Centralization and Decentralization | Organizational Configurations | Organization Chart | Outsourcing
Return to Management Hub: Change & Organization | Finance & Investing | Knowledge & Intangibles | Strategy
|
12manage for: |
|
|
|
|
| ● Jos Huizer (Netherlands) | Culture Clashes in M&A | "Good point! Prior to any M&A it is all about the "up"side, while talking down the effects on the "down"side (after all, who invests in Downers?). Culture merging is dealing with that latter. Further, Cultural mergers need long term planning Balance sheets may quickly change, people tend to change a lot slower. I speak here from my studies and own experience. Culture DD may be a good thing, to draw the paradigms of the companies and their stakeholders (!) so that the new team realizes what they are up against. How about a "Director of Culture" sort of title to show the seriousness?" | |
| ● ColDow (New Zealand) | Procedural Changes in M&A | "In a number of cases, from my experience, procedural changes which are introduced from the new owners tend to slow the cultural change. This can happen if the current staff are not included in the change process and have the new procedure forced upon them." | |
| ● John (England) | France | "Good point, I have experienced this first hand" | |
| ● Ramesh (India) | Culture clashes in M&A | "The culture identification process should be done even before start of acquisition process. The role of HR and Integaration manager would be much easier in this stage. In the post acquisition the role of the HR and integration maanager is vital and inevitable. " | |
| ● (Sweden) | Culture Clashes in M&A | "This culture identification process is an area that I would like build a career within. At the moment I am trying to find a suitable course of action to reach this. What would you recommend? A job at a management consultant firm or a position at a larger company that has performed many M&As? I appreciate your input." |
| ● (UAE) | Strategic & Objective Planing | "Mergers are specifically integrating two different systems and planning modes into one stream and the top Mgt and HR should play a vital role and form strategic objectives and a planning team to focus and derive the set objectives rather than everybody doing different activities without planning." |
| ● Col S PRaman (India) | Merger Integration | "Bigger partner is able to provide emotional comfort, besides inspiring / mentoring leadership and mutual assistance and performance culture. Art of adopting best practices of small partner and re-assuring their freedom to achieve will go long way in integration. Statemanship of post-merger leadership is indispensible." |