|
|
Forget Borrow Learn
|
12manage reaches 100.000 members |
Achieving organizational excellence in innovation. Explanation of Forget Borrow Learn. Govindarajan and Trimble. ('05) |
|
What is the forget, borrow and learn framework? DescriptionEstablishing major innovations within the borders of a large corporation is one of the most complex and important challenges for management. A new business (NewCo) with high growth potential rarely coexists harmoniously with established Business Units (CoreCo). Often, innovation managers face considerable head winds, when they move strategic experiments out of the incubator into execution. The Forget, Borrow and Learn challenges from Vijay Govindarajan and Chris Trimble are helpful in dealing with these headwinds. The framework was first introduced in the article "Building Breakthrough Business Within Established Organizations" in the HBR of May 2005. When the model of Govindarajan and Trimble is applied well, the emphasis in innovation can be shifted to organizational excellence. In this way the organization is becoming less dependent on excellent leadership.
According to Govindarajan and Trimble, NewCo must forget
some of what made CoreCo successful, because NewCo and CoreCo have elemental
differences. Furthermore, NewCo must borrow some assets of CoreCo.
This is the biggest advantage NewCO has over independent competitors. Finally,
NewCo must be prepared to learn some things from the beginning. It is important to notice that the three challenges are complex.
Origin of the forget, borrow and learn theory. HistoryThe HBR article by Professor Govindarajan and Professor Trimble was adapted from their forthcoming book "Ten Rules for Strategic Innovators - from Idea to Execution".
Usage of the forget, borrow and learn method. Applications
Principles of the Forget Borrow Learn framework. Elements
Strengths of the Forget, Borrow and Learn method. Benefits
Limitations of the forget, borrow and learn theory. Disadvantages
Assumptions of the forget, borrow and learn framework. Conditions
Book: Govindarajan,
Trimble - Ten Rules for Strategic Innovators - from Idea to Execution -
Forget Borrow Learn Special Interest Group
Forget Borrow Learn ForumForget Borrow Learn Education & Events
Compare with the Forget Borrow Learn approach: Stage-Gate | Business Process Reengineering | Kaizen | Change Iceberg | Change Model Beckhard | Changing Organization Cultures | Levels of Culture | Change Phases | Appreciative Inquiry | Positive Deviance | RACI | Disruptive Innovation | Trajectories of Industry Change | Blue Ocean Strategy | Core Competence | ADL Matrix
Return to Management Hub: Change & Organization | Leadership | Program & Project Management | Strategy
|
12manage for: |
|
|
|
|
| ● Jeswan Singh (Malaysia) | Strategic Innovation (SI) | "The terminology on SI is varied but it all means managing the human capital assets differently to yield results in a challenging business environment. Key drivers of this effort are people effectiveness and leadership styles and passion for results orientation. Often this means changing mindsets of line managers & supervisors, emphasis on leadership by example, recognition of the key drivers to institute change management as a strategy to thrive not just survive." | |
| ● (Belgium) | H2 Achieve Strategic Innovation | "No innovative strategy before a business strategy. If the company has no strategic view on the business and the future of the company, all models can stay firmly locked up so, first think vision and purpose, then start to develop supporting strategies. This is the time to dust of the models..." | |
| ● Mehak Vaswani (India) | Change Management Through Innovation and Creativity | "Envisioning the future is neccesary. What do we want to achieve and the ways and means of achieving them is quite essential. Try implementing the learning process management. Unfreezing to inducing change and refreezing the change is essential. Innovation is associated with managing change in the best possible way." |
| ● Ruud v Houten (Netherlands) | Innovating Bottom-up or Top-down | "Check out 2 recent articles by professor Deschamps on this question. Deschamps makes a useful distinction between promoting bottum-up innovation and steering top-down innovation to develop an innovative company. BOTTOM-UP INNOVATION is fuelled by the ideas and initiative of individuals within a company. Companies can stimulate idea generation through hiring creative entrepreneurs and mechanisms such as: innovation performance measures, give “free time” to explore new ideas, network with idea providers, get close to the customer, and use reward systems to recognizing the providers of great ideas. Most important is to establish an innovation culture that encourages creativity and entrepreneurship. Such a culture must be customer-centric by understanding consumers intimately. Oher cultural factors are: encourage organizational creativity, appoint innovation champions, establish an entrepreneuerial culture, and a "can-do"climate and remove or reduce organizational barriers to innovation. TOP-DOWN INNOVATION is initiated and fuelled by an innovation vision and strategy of a company’s top management. A seamless innovation process is also important (sub-processes: business and technology intelligence, idea management, technology and supply base development and deployment, product and technology strategy and planning, program management, product lifecycle management). Internal and external networking with suppliers and partners and involving them in the innovation process as well as provuiding adequate innovation resources are also important in this form." |
|
| ● Venkatakrishnan (India) | Basics of Innovation | "While the points expressed by Prof. Govindarajan and Prof. Trimble are valid, it is also imperative to consider the following. 1. Innovations happen most when there is a need in a constrained situation. 2. It is abnormal to have a constrained situation all the time and every time. 3. Even in constrained situations normal solutions might work and solve the issue. Hence innovations are more driven by: a) the need to be different, b) to stay ahead in market, c) to satisfy stakeholders continuously if not delight them, d) under constrained situations where normal solutions are not feasible, e) time or effort or environment is a constraint, f) a situation that is open to new ideas and experiment, g) a situation that accepts and takes risks. Finally: there are no inhibitions." |