|
|
Soft Systems Methodology
|
Applying Systems Thinking to non-systemic situations. Explanation of Soft Systems Methodology of Checkland. ('81)Contributed by: Peter Weeks |
|
What is the Soft Systems Methodology? DescriptionThe Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) from Peter Checkland is a qualitative technique that can be used for applying Systems Thinking to non-systemic situations. It is a way of dealing with problem situations in which there is a high social, political and human activity component. This distinguishes SSM from other methodologies which deal with HARD problems that are often more technology-oriented.
SSM applies Systems Thinking to the real world of human organizations.
But crucially without assuming that the subject of enquiry is itself a simple
system. SSM therefore is a useful way to approach complex situations and corresponding
messy questions. Origin of the Soft Systems Methodology. HistorySSM originated from the understanding that "hard" Systems Thinking, such as Operations Research techniques, is inadequate for enquiring into large, complex organizational issues. Soft Systems Methodology was developed by Peter Checkland for the express purpose of dealing with problems of this type. He had been working in the industry for a number of years and had been working with a number of hard system methodologies. He saw how these were inadequate for the purpose of dealing with extremely complex problems which had a large social component. Therefore in the 1960s he goes to the University of Lancaster in an attempt to research this area, and to deal with these soft problems. He conceives his "Soft Systems Methodology" through a number of research projects in industry and its application and refinement over a number of years. The methodology, which is pretty much how we know it today, was published in 1981. By that time Checkland was firmly entrenched in University life and he had left the industry to pursue a career as a professor and researcher in Software Engineering.
Usage of the Soft Systems Methodology. Applications
Steps in the Soft Systems Methodology. ProcessThe following steps should be taken (often several iterations are needed):
Strengths of the Soft Systems Methodology. Benefits
Limitations of the Soft Systems Methodology. Pitfalls
Assumptions of the Soft Systems Methodology. Conditions
Book: Peter Checkland
- Systems Thinking, Systems Practice -
Soft Systems Methodology Special Interest Group
Soft Systems Methodology Forum
Soft Systems Methodology Education & Events
Compare with Soft Systems Methodology: Systems Thinking | Gestalt Theory | Dialectical Inquiry | Action Research
Return to Management Hub: Change & Organization | Communication & Skills | Knowledge & Intangibles | Strategy
|
12manage for: |
|
|
|
|
| ● Kay (UK) | Conceptual modelling explanation | "Hi Amrit, a possible and simple explanation to what a conceptual model is that it is a method used for representing the relationship between the concepts (entity). In this way the conceptual models can analyse the possible influences that the concepts can have on each other, leading to a better understanding of the problem situation. I am not really sure because I also had problems with understanding it when reading this article. Hope someone can comment on this whether it's right or not, or give a better explanation of conceptual model than mine :)" |
| ● Janeth (Kenya) | SSM versus HSM | "I'm not getting the main difference between SSM and HSM, can you please brief me?" | |
| ● Richardson (UK) | Understanding SSM | "Lee, think of SSM as a way to label an approach you want to take to research a 'messy' subject where you cannot agree to approach the research through any hard and fast methods ie statistics, maths. SSM gives you the freedom to 'wander around' your specific subject and qualify topics as they are uncovered. Using Rich Pictures to justify/qualify your findings. It also gives the reader of your research a quick and precise understanding of your research method. All the semantics about Weltanshauungen I would discard as 'noise' by researchers poorly acquinted with the German language. Think of using what Checkland suggests as reasonable when you wish to formulate a finding from different points of views when describing a sub-topic." |
|
| ● Charlie (UK) | Response to Janeth | "My personal opininion: HSM is applicable to complex systems, but I think assumes things can be measured and therefore managed. It is based on a positivisic attitude that all may be rationalised and explained.
SSM also deals with complex systems - the most complex sytems that probably exist - human or social systems (or systems were human or social form a large part). SSM implies you do not have to rationalise or measure, but that you join with a social system in the problem domain you are trying to work in, and you learn as a group, by mutually exploring the problem domain, and reach accomodations and agreements for new things to do, that improve matters in the problem domain. The description of the SSM steps above do not capture this learning and sharing agreement aspect - it smacks to much of a hard systems approach... I really do recommend Checklands book. Hope you find this useful." |
|
| ● Chris (UK) | SSM | "I used this website and SSM in a University project last year resulting in great success. Thank you for all the information provided I found it all very useful and it helped me to get a great grade in my E-Busines project. Kind Regards Chris" |
| ● Vinod kumar (Australia) | What is the role of rich pictures in SSM | "The rich pictures are easy to show your thinking basically individuals perspective of the problem situation. In different countries where there are language barriers rich pictures are more helpful to communicate between stakeholders and BA ." | |
| ● (Jordan) | Rich Picture | "Rich Picture is a tool that helps the consultant view the current state of the situation from different worldviews, it facilitates the discussion since using drawings allows the participants to express the idea as in reality. The process of drawing the rich picture requires the facilitator to have excellent analytical skills and abilities to understand the culture and the politics within the situation which is required for the next stages." |
| ● (Brazil) | SSM | "Support of Identification and Confrontation of Problems-Situations (SIESP). Revista do Serviço Público - RSP, v.59, n.01, jan/mar, 2008, ISSN: 0034/9240." | |
| ● Ledington (Australia) | Books for SSM | "Checkland has published a number of books on SSM and its development. They are still the best source of material on SSM, although they can be quite difficult to follow. Brian Wilson has also published a couple of books on using SSM and they are more practitioner oriented than research orients. Finally there is Practical Systems Thinking by Alan Waring, and Information in Action: Soft Systems Methodology by Davies and Ledington (although it's out of print)." |
| ● Paul Forbes (Australia) | Rich Pictures | "RPs are a visual representation of a situation on a single page that captures the dynamics and relationships. It is simpler for user to ‘see’ a situation using this format than similar prose can convey. The RP can be used as a tool of debate, getting people to talk to the RP (putting it forward as a heuristic tool) can be very effective in clarifying or resolving a situation. During one report to a company in London my presentation to the board was the RP which contained not a single word, and all members of the board expressed they saw clearly where they were and where they were headed. There isn’t a set format for an RP, what is meaningful to you is what matters; you then develop it as part of the debate. Remember you are orchestrating a debate amongst the participants in order to get them to create their progress. You are not a detached expert answering their problems; objectivity is achieved through transparency not stoicism." |
| ● Charles Omeh (Nigeria) | SSM For Energy Policy | "This may be a difficult task to accomplish considering the nuclear, coal and power sectors as specified in the context of Nigeria. The issues here is that it may be difficult to get all stake holders in the industry to agree on the proposed SSM due to what could be diverse and selfish interests in the country. Hard systems if segmented to different sectors, might be a better option." |