Business Process Reengineering
(BPR)

Fundamentally reconsidering and radically redesigning of organizational processes. Explanation of Business Process Reengineering of Hammer and Champy.

The Business Process Reengineering method (BPR) is described by Hammer and Champy as 'the fundamental reconsideration and the radical redesign of organizational processes, in order to achieve drastic improvement of current performance in cost, services and speed'.

Rather than organizing a firm into functional specialties (like production, accounting, marketing, etc.) and to look at the tasks that each function performs, Hammer and Champy recommend that we should look at complete processes. From materials acquisition, towards production, towards marketing and distribution. One should rebuild the firm into a series of processes.
 

Value creation for the customer is the leading factor for BPR and information technology often plays an important enabling role. Compare: Relationship Marketing

Michael Hammer and James Champy

The main proponents of re-engineering were Michael Hammer and James Champy. In a series of books including Reengineering the Corporation, Reengineering Management, and The Agenda, they argue that far too much time is wasted, passing on tasks from one department to another. They claim that it is far more efficient to appoint a team who perform all the tasks in the process.

A five step approach to Business Process Reengineering

Davenport (1992) prescribes a five-step approach to the Business Process Reengineering model:

1. Develop the business vision and process objectives: The BPR method is driven by a business vision which implies specific business objectives such as cost reduction, time reduction, output quality improvement.
2. Identify the business processes to be redesigned: most firms use the 'high-impact' approach which focuses on the most important processes or those that conflict most with the business vision. A lesser number of firms use the 'exhaustive approach' that attempts to identify all the processes within an organization and then prioritize them in order of redesign urgency.
3. Understand and measure the existing processes: to avoid the repeating of old mistakes and to provide a baseline for future improvements. Compare: Scientific Management
4. Identify IT levers: awareness of IT capabilities can and should influence BPR.
5. Design and build a prototype of the new process: the actual design should not be viewed as the end of the BPR process. Rather, it should be viewed as a prototype, with successive iterations. The metaphor of prototype aligns the Business Process Reengineering approach with quick delivery of results, and the involvement and satisfaction of customers.

As an additional 6th step of the BPR method, sometimes you find: to adapt the organizational structure, and the governance model, towards the newly designed primary process.

Generic Circumstances that influence whether BPR is advisable

Although it is difficult to give generic advice about this, some factors that can be considered are:

• Does the competition clearly outperform the company? Compare: Turnaround Management
• Are there many conflicts in the organization?
• Is there an extremely high frequency of meetings?
• Excessive use of non-structured communication? (memos, emails, etc)
• Is it possible to consider a more continuous approach of gradual, incremental improvements? (see: Kaizen).

Critics of the BPR approach

Reengineering has earned a bad reputation because such projects have often resulted in massive layoffs. In spite of the hype that surrounded the introduction of Business Process Reengineering, partially due to the fact that the authors of Reengineering the Corporation reportedly bought huge numbers of copies to reach the top of the bestseller lists, the method has not entirely lived up to its expectations. The main reasons seem to be that:

• BPR assumes that the factor that limits organization's performance is the ineffectiveness of its processes. This may or may not always be true. Also BPR offers no means to validate this assumption.
• BPR assumes the need to start the process of performance improvement with a "clean slate", i.e. totally disregard the status quo.
• BPR does not provide an effective way to focus the improvement efforts on the organization's constraints. (As done by Goldratt in the Theory of Constraints).
• Sometimes, or maybe quite often, a gradual and incremental change (such as Kaizen) may be a better approach.
• BPR is culturally biased towards the US way of thinking. (see: Cultural Dimensions)

BPR compared to Kaizen

When Kaizen is compared with the BPR method is it clear the Kaizen philosophy is more people-oriented, more easy to implement, but requires long-term discipline and provides only a small pace of change. The Business Process Reengineering approach on the other hand is harder, technology-oriented, it enables radical change but it requires considerable change management skills.

Book: Hammer and Champy - Reengineering the Corporation -

Book: Davenport - Process Innovation -

BPR Forum

John Bosco - Nigeria

BPR in Today's World

"BPR came when it was much needed, though I think its usefulness is not over, we cannot also deny the fact that its bottleneck is a factor to be considered. However with a tool like the lean, all that BPR stands for can be completely consumed and with a better working environment. Having said that if the proponents of BPR still have something to added inorder to check its shortfall, I think it would be great. For now I think there are better tools that meet the challenges created as a rersult of market dynamics."

0

Fikir Abere - Ethiopia

BPR is needed in Ethiopia

"I believe BPR is an important change management tool. It is a radicalist tool. You can't help all the bureacratic mess created on customers with any other tools - be it kaizen , TQM,etc. That is why the Government of Ethiopia at all levels is using this tool to streamline bureacracy and bring dramatic improvement in public service delivery."

5

Alemayehu - Ethiopia

Required Management Skills

"BPR requires highly skillfull management and deep knowledge of what needs to be done. Is it possible to do BPR with less knowledge of what must be done?"

2

Belaya - Ethiopia

BPR in agricultural research?

"Is BPR applicable for the agricultural research sector? Is there anyone in the world who can share me the experience how to reengineer the agricultural research system?"

6

F.N. Bhutta - Pakistan

BPR Proverb

"I agree with the author about BPR. In fact BPR is a good medicine for unreasonable people, but bad for reasonable people. Idea is there but it depends on your creativity how you can accomplish it. I believe BPR is "Mental, Fanatical and Caustic". -- "

11

Editor - NL

Quotes on BPR

"Do you know some deep, famous or funny quotes on Business Process Reengineering? Quotations? Proverbs? Please share them as a reaction to this posting and mention the author. To get started, here's my favorite: 'Reengineering must be fundamental, radical and drastic.' - Michael Hammer & James Champy 1993, American management consultants"

92

Bruce Ware - USA

Costs of BPR - Any ideas?

"Hoping that someone can point to some reference providing info on how much a BPR activity would cost -- some percentage of overhead expenses??"

42

Scott Chen - USA

BPR: Lean business processes

"Jeff Hall in Management Services, Winter2006, Vol. 50 Issue 4, encourages the adoption of a lean approach to business process improvement. Lean is about building world class processes that deliver best quality, lowest cost and shortest cycle time through the elimination of waste. With lean being applied to business process, businesses could have a single process team who would be responsible for anything involving the end-to-end ordering-fulfilling-invoicing process thereby reducing waste in the process."

30

Danish Noor - USA

How practical BPR approach is

"The underlying assumption on BPR presented in this article is "task completion through unified team effort". But how is this possible in practical business world --? There arn`t no one group of members knowledgeable enough on all business processes. That`s the core reason of existance of organization to achieve more through collective endeavours. An example a normal product design & development require cross - function participation and activities from MARKETING -- for voice of customer information, ENGINEERING -- for product specification development, MANUFACTURING -- for existing manufacturing capacity understanding, PRODUCTION -- for lead time understanding, QUALITY -- for performance excellence. "

27

Dexter Borbe - USA

Selective Application

"Authors and consultants like Michael Hammer often present big ideas, because that is the realm they deal with as academics. I think that being a good practitioner means taking the good ideas and applying them, as opposed to applying the concepts wholesale. I would agree with Hammer very much that most organizations waste a lot of time passing on work from one department to another. What can we do to remove these artificial boundaries?"

14

Comment on this Page

BPR Special Interest Group

BPR Education & Events

Compare BPR with:  Outsourcing  |  Change Phases  |  Catastrophe Theory  |  Organic Organization  |  Core Group Theory  |  Appreciative Inquiry  |  Positive Deviance  |  Forget Borrow Learn  |  Planned Behavior  |  Force Field Analysis  |  Kaizen  |  Value Engineering  |  Value Stream Mapping  |  Change Management  |  Six Change Approaches  |  Managing for Value  |  Dimensions of Change  |  Eight Attributes of Management Excellence  |  Five Disciplines  |  Ten Principles of Reinvention  |  Fourteen Points of Management  |  Blue Ocean Strategy  |  Bottom of the Pyramid

Return to Management Hub: Change & Organization  |  Marketing  |  Strategy  |  Supply Chain & Quality

More Management Methods, Models and Theory

12manage for:

• Consultants
• Managers
• MBA Students
• Business Schools