|
The
Business Process Reengineering method (BPR) is described by Hammer and Champy
as 'the fundamental reconsideration and the radical redesign of organizational
processes, in order to achieve drastic improvement of current performance
in cost, services and speed'.
Rather than organizing a firm into functional specialties (like production,
accounting, marketing, etc.) and to look at the tasks that each function performs,
Hammer and Champy recommend that we should look at complete processes. From
materials acquisition, towards production, towards marketing and distribution.
One should rebuild the firm into a series of processes.
Value creation for the customer is the leading factor for BPR and information
technology often plays an important enabling role. Compare:
Relationship Marketing
Michael Hammer and James Champy
The main proponents of re-engineering were Michael Hammer and James Champy.
In a series of books including Reengineering the Corporation, Reengineering
Management, and The Agenda, they argue that far too much time is wasted, passing
on tasks from one department to another. They claim that it is far more efficient
to appoint a team who perform all the tasks in the process.
A five step approach to Business Process Reengineering
Davenport (1992) prescribes a five-step approach to the Business Process
Reengineering model:
- Develop the business vision and process objectives: The BPR method
is driven by a business vision which implies specific business objectives
such as cost reduction, time reduction, output quality improvement.
- Identify the business processes to be redesigned: most firms
use the 'high-impact' approach which focuses on the most important processes
or those that conflict most with the business vision. A lesser number of
firms use the 'exhaustive approach' that attempts to identify all the processes
within an organization and then prioritize them in order of redesign urgency.
- Understand and measure the existing processes: to avoid the repeating
of old mistakes and to provide a baseline for future improvements.
Compare: Scientific
Management
- Identify IT levers: awareness of IT capabilities can and should
influence BPR.
- Design and build a prototype of the new process: the actual design
should not be viewed as the end of the BPR process. Rather, it should be
viewed as a prototype, with successive iterations. The metaphor of prototype
aligns the Business Process Reengineering approach with quick delivery of
results, and the involvement and satisfaction of customers.
As an additional 6th step of the BPR method, sometimes you find: to adapt
the organizational structure, and the governance model, towards the newly
designed primary process.
Generic Circumstances that influence whether BPR is advisable
Although it is difficult to give generic advice about this, some factors
that can be considered are:
- Does the competition clearly outperform the company? Compare:
Turnaround Management
- Are there many conflicts in the organization?
- Is there an extremely high frequency of meetings?
- Excessive use of non-structured communication? (memos, emails, etc)
- Is it possible to consider a more continuous approach of gradual, incremental
improvements? (see: Kaizen).
Critics of the BPR approach
Reengineering has earned a bad reputation because such projects have often
resulted in massive layoffs. In spite of the hype that surrounded the introduction
of Business Process Reengineering, partially due to the fact that the authors
of Reengineering the Corporation reportedly bought huge numbers of copies
to reach the top of the bestseller lists, the method has not entirely lived
up to its expectations. The main reasons seem to be that:
- BPR assumes that the factor that limits organization's performance is
the ineffectiveness of its processes. This may or may not always be true.
Also BPR offers no means to validate this assumption.
- BPR assumes the need to start the process of performance improvement
with a "clean slate", i.e. totally disregard the status quo.
- BPR does not provide an effective way to focus the improvement efforts
on the organization's constraints. (As done by Goldratt in the
Theory of Constraints).
- Sometimes, or maybe quite often, a gradual and incremental change (such
as Kaizen) may be a better approach.
- BPR is culturally biased towards the US way of thinking. (see:
Cultural Dimensions)
BPR compared to Kaizen
When Kaizen is compared with the BPR method is it clear the Kaizen philosophy
is more people-oriented, more easy to implement, but requires long-term discipline
and provides only a small pace of change. The Business Process Reengineering
approach on the other hand is harder, technology-oriented, it enables radical
change but it requires considerable change management skills.
Book: Hammer and
Champy - Reengineering the Corporation -

Book: Davenport
- Process Innovation -

|
BPR Works only Top-Down "I am a BPR envangelist and in my experience BPR is only effective if it starts from the top, i.e. when senior managers accept the challenge to first revamp their mental models of management before the..." |
|
Business Reengineering References "Can you point out companies who were successful in BPR implementation? And what is the success rate of these projects?
I am currently doing my thesis on this topic. Any assistance would be..." |
|
Reward Management During Business Reengineering "More often than not, Kenyan organizations in need of adapting to changes in the competitive business environment fail to satisfy the needs of the diverse groups of employees within the company. Many e..." |
|
Personal Business Process Reengineering? "Would anyone help me with one doubt here, can the concept of BPR be implemented in anyone’s personal life to have a radical change? Or is BPR specifically for business need only?" |
|
BPR Through E-governance Initiatives "In the public sector field of a government like India, implementing a 100% BPR would be difficult. Because the waste processes & positions identified out of such exercises would be of greater portion ..." |
|
BPR is Like A Pipeline Through Pour Water "We know that drinking water comes through a tube for transporting clean water even when it's going through pour water. Without the pipe we do not get clean water. Similarly, to bring change in our cou..." |
|
Misunderstandings around BPR "Many people misunderstand the concept of BPR as a natural phenomenon or for resisting changes to roll back from its unfavorable impact. Say downsizing.
Such people are heard in quoting wrong sayings ..." |
|
Business Process Reengineering can be abused "I learned that BPR is a helpful tool for developing countries to break their old and unproductive thinking ans system. But I also realized that incompetent leaders can simply abuse it." |
|
ERP and Business Process Reengineering "Business process reengineering involves radically changing the status quo to fulfil customer's expectation and keep them coming back. This involves change management thinking and implementation of org..." |
|
BPR supported by TQM "After we implement BPR on the ground we should use TQM as a continuous improvement tool or cal it Kaizen or other tools to maintain the system and satisfy the "moving target" customers needs." |
|
BPR needs Positive Thinking "BPR doesn't need a special management skill, rather it needs positive thinking and a changing way of thinking." |
|
BPR is needed in Ethiopia "I believe BPR is an important change management tool. It is a radicalist tool. You can't help all the bureacratic mess created on customers with any other tools - be it kaizen , TQM,etc. That is why..." |
|
Required Management Skills "BPR requires highly skillfull management and deep knowledge of what needs to be done. Is it possible to do BPR with less knowledge of what must be done?" |
|
BPR in agricultural research? "Is BPR applicable for the agricultural research sector? Is there anyone in the world who can share me the experience how to reengineer the agricultural research system?" |
|
Selective Application "Authors and consultants like Michael Hammer often present big ideas, because that is the realm they deal with as academics. I think that being a good practitioner means taking the good ideas and appl..." |
|
Costs of BPR - Any ideas? "Hoping that someone can point to some reference providing info on how much a BPR activity would cost -- some percentage of overhead expenses??" |
|
How practical BPR approach is "The underlying assumption on BPR presented in this article is "task completion through unified team effort". But how is this possible in practical business world --? There arn`t no one group of member..." |
|
Quotes on Business Process Reengineering "Do you know some deep, famous or funny quotes on Business Process Reengineering? Quotations? Proverbs? Please share them as a reaction to this posting and mention the author. To get started, here's my..." |
|
BPR: Lean business processes "Jeff Hall in Management Services, Winter2006, Vol. 50 Issue 4, encourages the adoption of a lean approach to business process improvement. Lean is about building world class processes that deliver bes..." |
|
Keep in touch with this topic
|
|
|
|
|
Business Process Reengineering Special Interest Group
|
|
|
|
Compare BPR with: Outsourcing
| Change Phases |
Catastrophe Theory
| Organic Organization
| Core Group Theory
| Appreciative
Inquiry |
Positive Deviance |
Forget Borrow Learn
| Planned Behavior
| Force Field Analysis
| Kaizen |
Value Engineering
| Value Stream Mapping
| Change Management
| Six Change Approaches
| Managing for Value |
Dimensions of
Change |
Eight
Attributes of Management Excellence |
Five Disciplines |
Ten Principles of
Reinvention |
Fourteen Points of Management
| Blue Ocean Strategy
| Bottom of the
Pyramid
Return to Management Hub: Change & Organization | Marketing
| Strategy |
Supply Chain & Quality
More Management Methods, Models and Theory
|
|
|
Keep in touch with this topic
|
|
|
Options
|
|
12manage for:
|
12manage in:
|
|
|
|
|
|