What is Situational Leadership? Description
The Situational Leadership method from Kenneth Blanchard and Paul Hersey
holds that managers must use different leadership styles depending on the
situation. The model allows you to analyze the needs of the situation you're
in, and then use the most appropriate leadership style. Depending on employees'
competences in their task areas and commitment to their tasks, your leadership
style should vary from one person to another. You may even lead the same person
one way sometimes, and another way at other times.
Blanchard and Hersey characterized leadership style in terms of the amount
of direction and of support that the leader gives to his or her followers,
and so created a simple matrix (figure).
Leadership
Behavior of the Leader
- S1 - Telling / Directing - High task focus, low relationship
focus - leaders define the roles and tasks of the 'follower', and supervise
them closely. Decisions are made by the leader and announced, so communication
is largely one-way. For people who lack competence but are enthusiastic
and committed. They need direction and supervision to get them started.
- S2 - Selling / Coaching - High task focus, high relationship
focus - leaders still define roles and tasks, but seeks ideas and suggestions
from the follower. Decisions remain the leader's prerogative, but communication
is much more two-way. For people who have some competence but lack commitment.
They need direction and supervision because they are still relatively inexperienced.
They also need support and praise to build their self-esteem, and involvement
in decision-making to restore their commitment.
- S3 - Participating / Supporting - Low task focus, high relationship
focus - leaders pass day-to-day decisions, such as task allocation and processes,
to the follower. The leader facilitates and takes part in decisions, but
control is with the follower. For people who have competence, but lack confidence
or motivation. They do not need much direction because of their skills,
but support is necessary to bolster their confidence and motivation.
- S4 - Delegating - Low task focus, low relationship focus - leaders
are still involved in decisions and problem-solving, but control is with
the follower. The follower decides when and how the leader will be involved.
For people who have both competence and commitment. They are able and willing
to work on a project by themselves with little supervision or support.
Effective leaders are versatile in being able to move around the matrix
according to the situation, so there is no style that is always right. However,
we tend to have a preferred style, and in applying Situational Leadership
you need to know which one that is for you.
Likewise, the competence and commitment of the follower can also
be distinguished in 4 quadrants.
Development Level of the Follower
- D4 - High Competence, High Commitment - Experienced at the job,
and comfortable with their own ability to do it well. May even be more skilled
than the leader.
- D3 - High Competence, Variable Commitment - Experienced and capable,
but may lack the confidence to go it alone, or the motivation to do it well
/ quickly.
- D2 - Some Competence, Low Commitment - May have some relevant
skills, but won't be able to do the job without help. The task or the situation
may be new to them.
- D1 - Low Competence, High Commitment - Generally lacking the
specific skills required for the job in hand, but has the confidence and
/ or motivation to tackle it.
Similar to the leadership styles, the development levels are also situational.
A person could be skilled, confident and motivated for one part of his his
job, but could be less competent for another part of the job.
Blanchard and Hersey said that the Leadership Style (S1 - S4) of the leader
must correspond to the Development level (D1 - D4) of the follower - and it's
the leader who adapts. By adopting the right style to suit the follower's
development level, work gets done, relationships are built up, and most importantly,
the follower's development level will rise to D4, to everyone's benefit.
Steps in Situational Leadership. Process
- Make an overview per employee of his/her tasks
- Assess the employee on each task (D1...D4)
- Decide on the leadership (management) style per task (S1...S4)
- Discuss the situation with the employee
- Make a joint plan
- Follow-up, check and correct
Strengths of the Situational Leadership model. Benefits
- Easy to understand
- Easy to use
Limitations of the Situational Leadership model. Disadvantages
- Model fails to distinguish between leadership and management. What is
called leadership style is really management style. Compare also:
Leadership Pipeline
- Leadership is not primarily about making decisions anyway - it is about
inspiring people to change direction.
- Leaders may indeed vary the way they inspire people to change. But this
is when they have already decided on the need to change. Hence leadership
style does not reduce to decision making style.
- Focuses too exclusively on what the person in charge does.
- Of course both leaders and managers have to behave differently in different
situations. But that is just a trivial fact of life, rather than anything
profound in terms of our basic understanding of what it means to lead or
manage.
Assumptions of Situational Leadership. Conditions
- Leaders should adapt their style to follower 'maturity', based on how
ready and willing the follower is to perform required tasks (that is, their
competence and motivation).
- There are four leadership styles that match the four combinations of
high/low readiness and willingness.
- The four styles suggest that leaders should put greater or less focus
on the task in question and/or the relationship between the leader and the
follower.
- Presumes that leadership is about how the boss makes decisions.
Book: Paul Hersey,
Kenneth H. Blanchard, Dewey E. Johnson - Management of Organizational Behavior:
Leading -

|
Situational Social Communication Styles "Every person has a specific social communication style, and therefor reacts different to any goal setting by management. The insight a manager has on the social communication style of his/her employee is essential for motivating people." |
|
Is Situational Leadership Innate in Good Leaders? "Before I discovered that someone had put a name to this technique, I thought it was one of the things in the kit bag of a good manager. It just makes such basic common sense that I'd be surprised if every successful manager hasn't used it to a greater or lesser degree during their career - perhaps like me without knowing there was a label for it." |
|
Leading a New Institution "My comment is a question seeking some guidance: here is my challenge and need some perspectives on. I am part of a new institution where everything is being done form scratch. The team has agreed on some core values in line with the established mission and vision statements. What is the role of the CEO and what style of management should be used in trying to build this organization around those core values?" |
|
Approaching Different People Differently "I can fully agree with your statements. While I do not consider myself a "seasoned" leader, I have found that I need to approach different people differently in order to get them motivated and have the work accomplished. A leader really needs to realize that each employee is different and each situation can be different. While some may consider this a management style, I feel it is leadership because it addresses motivation and speaks to working relationships." |
|
We Naturally Regress to our Dominant Leadership Style! "It may be "... just a trivial fact of life that leaders have to behave differently in different situations".
But another "trivial" fact is that we "naturally" regress to our dominant style without constant vigilance to treat every situation as a unique encounter that will not be served by a "one size fits all" method." |
|
Situational Leadership Helps you to Focus on Particular Methods "I am currently doing a L5 Dipl in Management and part of one assignment is to analyze different types/styles of leadership. Having read though all your comments it has really helped me get a full range of perspectives. It is really good to hear the opinions of experienced managers. I do think that Situational Leadership is more of a management than leadership style, however your own leadership style can be developed alongside. How can you chose to deliver the different situational types would reflect this to a certain extent would it not? It is simple to the point of common sense in many ways, as in life everyone behaves differently according to the situation, but it helps to focus on your particular methods enabling you to plan more effectively and consistently." |
|
Situational Leadership Model works for me "It's great model and I used it in my management. It works to help the business run smoothly. Very effective in the individual differences as well as in appraising your employee." |
|
Blanchard Leadership Theory is Correct "Most of the comments on shortcomings of the theory reflect the authors failure to understand the theory. Although the theory is a little simplistic in order to fit into the boxes, it is also essentially correct. Many poor leaders do not fundamentally change their leadership style, and are incapable of doing so. For example, some take charge leaders are unable to turn over responsibility to their capable staff -- they micromanage.
Leadership is not solely about inspiration. Inspiration without decisions accomplishes nothing.
Of course, the book is about management. The point is that good management is actually leadership. Some make a distinction between leadership and management, but that distinction is often made between leadership and poor management.
Of course the theory focuses on what leaders "do." A do nothing leader is worthless. We are only what we do. An unexpressed thought persuades no one. We have do do something to persuade, etc." |
|
Situational Leadership is a Key to Success in Good Governance "In good governance, one of the key factor of its success is situational leadership, in as much as leader needs to adopt to the present situation in their locality rather than indulge in the previous situation of a former leader. Rather than indulging on a non-productive activity, its better for leaders to discern or find out what causes the problem and learn more in solving such problems.
Situational leadership by Blanchard can be of great help in resolving some leadership issues and anyone can develop one suitable application with regards to his needs." |
|
Situational Leadership Board Game "I remember planning a situational leadership board game in 1976 as a student. Is that game still available? Who has some more information about other situational leadership games?" |
|
Commitment in Situational Leadership "Commitment is variable, it depends upon the job and the management, inconsistant management of staff will cause yo yo commitment. Although simplistic the HB model serves perfectly for the amount of poor managers in the workplace to attempt to get it right." |
|
Leadership vs Management "Leadership is getting people to do what you want them to do, even when they don't want to do it. Management is the efficient and effective use of resources, including people. Yes, the leader and the manager both have to adapt their ways to get the most from their people, but this model over-categorises - I prefer to think of a spectrum rather than a set of boxes." |
|
Situational Leadership is Situational "Yes Leadership is many things -but leaders also face different situations which requires different solutions -Hence Situational Leadership! It really is what it says on the tin!!" |
|
Applications of Managerial Grid in Practice "I have successfully applied the model in many situations.
It allows me to adjust my management style (downward management) to meet the needs of my employees.
It also allows me to adjust my manager's style (upward management) to meet my needs as situations change.
Argue the theory and semantics as you like, it works." |
|
Little Research to Backup Situational Leadership "The SL model is appealing in its simplicity - hence, probably its attraction as a training model - but there is very little research evidence to support it. The formula it offers managers is a fairly dodgy promise.
I would challenge your assertion that leadership is not primaily about decision-making - why isn't it? Read the literature - Vroom, Tannenbaum and Schmidt, Yukl . . . etc. Leadership is many things, it isn't just about inspiring people." |
|
HERSEY BLANCHARD MODEL "The model follows S3 style in case of high competence& variable commitment. But commitment can never be variable,it is either high or low." |
|
|
|
Situational Leadership Special Interest Group
|
|
|
|
Situational Leadership Education & Events
|
|
|
Compare with Blanchard and Hersey Situational Leadership:
Leadership Styles
| Stages of Team
Development |
Leadership Pipeline
| Leadership Continuum
| Hagberg Model
of Personal Power |
Managerial Grid
| Path-Goal Theory
| Theory X Theory Y
| Contingency Theory
| Competing
Values Framework |
Expectancy Theory
| Result Oriented
Management |
Bases of Social Power
| Seven Surprises
| Seven Habits |
Results-Based Leadership
| Level 5 Leadership
| Servant-Leadership
Return to Management Hub: Communication & Skills | Human Resources
| Leadership
More Management Methods, Models and Theory
|
|
|
Situational Leadership Sponsor
|
|
|
Special Interest Group Leader
|
|
|
|
|
All you need to know about management
|
|
|
Management Smart Card
|
|
|
|
|